Adopting a Black Baby is Cheaper Than Adopting a White Baby; ..
mitt romney s family welcomes adopted grandchild a black baby
I rarely, if ever, agree with Marc Lamont Hill, but he’s absolutely right on this one: white guilt has taken over the GOP establishment, and Romney may be the RINO’s fall back plan for 2016. So what do you do? Go and adopt a black baby…that should work. What a bunch of clueless phonies.
BTW, wasn’t it Rove and George W’s campaign who made fun of the McCain’s adopting of a minority child–during their 2000 primary contest?
This bunch is a mess.
Sandra Bullock Adopting a Black Baby By GloZell
you have a real good point and it seems they all of a sudden jumped on that “adopt a black baby” bandwagon… there are lots of white babies who have been abused , moms on drugs,, born to drug addicted moms… but all of a sudden these white women want a black baby!
The paper found that price does play a significant role in choosing a child to adopt—perhaps enough to overcome racial bias. But for the black child market to clear, prices must fall further. The paper finds the cost of adopting a black baby needs to be $38,000 lower than the cost of a white baby, in order to make parents indifferent to race. Boys will need to cost $16,000 less than girls. No doubt, the idea of placing a lower value on children based on race or sex is repugnant. But if it results in finding a loving home for children, and sparing them years in foster care, it may be the lesser of two evils. This suggests that subsidising the adoption of certain kinds of children may be worthwhile. And so far there is that subsidies have increased the rate of adoption out of foster care. Food for thought.First of all - how can we be sure they're not Jewish? But let's presume they aren't. Two words - race traitors. How these morons can show their faces in public is beyond me. There are plenty of white babies that need parents. What the hell do they want to adopt a black baby for?